From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QKVg2-00022c-Lb for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:11:42 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so493838ewy.36 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Coldfire, d9000e and patch RFC From: Artem Bityutskiy To: angelo In-Reply-To: <4DC8F73A.1070708@gmail.com> References: <4DC8F73A.1070708@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:08:10 +0300 Message-ID: <1305205690.14423.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-net@vger-kernel.org, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , uClinux development list Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 10:28 +0200, angelo wrote: > Hi all, > > some months ago i posted to these lists (net, m68k) a patch. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=129447772217552&w=2 > > > I did a small job to allow dm9000e to be used with a Coldfire processor, > and for the functional point of view the patch works fine. Well, one obvious suggestion is that you should not introduce any Kconfig option for this and you should get the information about the bus from the bootloader via the device tree. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)