From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QKWNc-0002Rp-Nj for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:56:41 +0000 Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so509469eyh.36 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Bug in MTD NAND ONFI chipsize detection From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Nitin Garg In-Reply-To: References: <20110511183322.da0739c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4DCB908C.80505@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:53:00 +0300 Message-ID: <1305208380.14423.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Matthieu CASTET Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 07:34 -0500, Nitin Garg wrote: > I do not see any diff for mtd. Please, send a patch with a better commit message clearly explaining which problem the bug fixes, and make sure the commit message is understandable even by people who have not read the ONFI standard. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)