From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QNLzu-00052I-3Y for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 09:27:54 +0000 Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so1332898eyh.36 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: document the "free space fixup" flag From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "Matthew L. Creech" In-Reply-To: <1305783137-13374-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> References: <1305197870.2713.95.camel@localhost> <1305783137-13374-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:24:01 +0300 Message-ID: <1305883441.2630.122.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 01:32 -0400, Matthew L. Creech wrote: > Several parts of the UBI and UBIFS documentation already mention the need to > use ubiformat when flashing UBIFS images. Add a new FAQ entry for the "free > space fixup" flag as an alternative in recent kernels, and put links to it in > these existing locations. > --- Pushed, thanks. I've only added few changes as a patch on top of yours, also pushed. > -why you should use ubiformat.

> +why you should use ubiformat, or generate your UBIFS images with > +the free space fixup flag if that > +is not possible.

I've removed this change because the first link already contains the "fixup" link. Pluse I've updated news and added a bit more information about the fixup thingy. Thank you! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)