From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QSWq0-0002M5-2P for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:03:04 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so904645ewy.36 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: OneNAND: Fix wrong subpage_sft at 4KiB pagesize From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Kyungmin Park , Roman Tereshonkov In-Reply-To: <20110602064832.GA7319@july> References: <20110602064832.GA7319@july> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:58:52 +0300 Message-ID: <1307116732.3069.26.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:48 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > From: Kyungmin Park > > There's no case to use the subpage for 4KiB pagesize. > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park I think Roman was testing subpage support with 4KiB pages and it worked, but I'm not sure and I did not read the specs. Let's ask Roman. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)