From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QTuBg-0007VW-Mb for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:11:09 +0000 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14so4377129fxm.36 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 04:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] nand: nand_base: Always initialise oob_poi before writing OOB data From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "THOMSON, Adam (Adam)" In-Reply-To: References: <1306396908.2785.152.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:06:47 +0300 Message-ID: <1307444807.11104.76.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 17:15 +0200, THOMSON, Adam (Adam) wrote: > Having looked briefly at the read side code in nand_base.c, > it does look like it should be enough to remove the second > memset and leave the read side code as is, but will examine > it more thoroughly before I post a patch. Any news? :-) -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)