From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QUt0s-0000QY-GN for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:08:03 +0000 Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so954125eyh.36 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Ubiattach] "vtbl_check: too large reserved_pebs" From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Gilles In-Reply-To: References: <1307623105.7374.91.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:03:40 +0300 Message-ID: <1307678620.7374.131.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:18 +0200, Gilles wrote: > 2. ubiformat takes about 10-15mn to complete: Is there a way to speed > things up, or is it just due to the CPU+NAND that the appliance uses? http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html#L_attach_faster > 3. Finally, when do I have to use ubimkvol? When you want to dynamically (run-time) create a new UBI volume. You do not necessarily have to do this. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)