From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.212.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qlvnu-00078M-Ph for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:33:07 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so1012461vws.36 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:33:02 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matthew L. Creech" To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 2/3] UBI FAQ: correct link Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:32:55 -0400 Message-Id: <1311741176-8850-2-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1311741176-8850-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> References: <1311741176-8850-1-git-send-email-mlcreech@gmail.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Signed-off-by: Matthew L. Creech --- faq/ubi.xml | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/ubi.xml b/faq/ubi.xml index 6ddb23c..294403a 100644 --- a/faq/ubi.xml +++ b/faq/ubi.xml @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ reboots.

Yes, it may, as long as the flash is supported by the MTD layer. UBI does not use OOB and it requires data to be written sequentially (see -here). UBI guarantees that the difference +here). UBI guarantees that the difference between maximum and minimum erase-counters is withing certain threshold, which is 4096 by default. Since MLC flashes have quite low eraseblock life-cycle (about 1000-10000, unlike 100000-1000000 for SLC NAND and NOR -- 1.7.4.1