From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QvkUb-0002jQ-TZ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:29:47 +0000 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so4490869gwb.36 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] nanddump: kill usages of MEMSETOOBSEL ioctl From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Brian Norris Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:31:32 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1313773676-12879-11-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> References: <1313773676-12879-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1313773676-12879-11-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1314081097.2645.65.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Kevin Cernekee , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Mike Frysinger Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 10:07 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > The ioctl MEMSETOOBSEL hasn't existed for a long time. Using it as a > backup to MTDFILEMODE is pointless, so just remove every time it is > used. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris Should we kill the macro definition from the kernel as well? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy