From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1R9xs8-00014x-LQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:36:49 +0000 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2so3516810bka.36 for ; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2/security.c: local functions should be static From: Artem Bityutskiy To: H Hartley Sweeten Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:39:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <201109231556.15973.hartleys@visionengravers.com> References: <201109231556.15973.hartleys@visionengravers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1317469194.19426.86.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mtd , dwmw2@infradead.org, Linux Kernel Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 15:56 -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > Quiets the sparse noise: > > warning: symbol 'jffs2_initxattrs' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten > Cc: David Woodhouse Against which tree is this patch? My l2-mtd-2.6 tree does not have this function, and it is based on Linux 3.1-rc2. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy