From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1REdrn-0001db-RM for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:15:48 +0000 Received: by wwg9 with SMTP id 9so569518wwg.18 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: erase block < 8KiB From: Artem Bityutskiy To: angelo Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:15:15 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4E97F7C2.1050803@gmail.com> References: <4E8977DF.1030808@gmail.com> <1318581933.12351.70.camel@sauron> <4E97F7C2.1050803@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1318583721.12351.80.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 10:50 +0200, angelo wrote: > I already done this, and posted the patch for 64 KB sector. > > But i none here still answered to the question : > why the cfi_cmdset_0002 selects for this flash the 4KB sector instead of > the 64KB ? In this way, the non-working of jffs2 is guaranteed, since > the minimal block size is 4K + some bytes. I do not know CFI, sorry, but you probably should do this on a higher level than CFI, something between JFFS2 and MTD. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy