From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RKFEx-0007qK-0c for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:10:53 +0000 Received: by bke11 with SMTP id 11so2675729bke.36 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] phram: make kernel boot command line arguments work From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "Fache, Herve" Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:10:44 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1318866038-11781-1-git-send-email-h-fache@ti.com> <1319127421.20953.5.camel@sauron> <1319528259.14178.3.camel@golum> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1319919048.2126.14.camel@koala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, joern@logfs.org, joern@lazybastard.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:09 +0200, Fache, Herve wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:37, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Yeah, I thought checkpatch.pl would blame you for improper comments > > style. The standard way to write comments is described in > > Documentation/CodingStyle. > > I have to admit I just re-used the original patch's comments. Do they > need to be changed prior to merging? No, that's fine, thanks! Artem.