Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: mark tests EXPERIMENTAL

Wolfram Sang
2011-10-29T20:40:41Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 879 bytes --]

> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/Kconfig
> > index 4be8373..81d9b92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/Kconfig
> > @@ -27,12 +27,15 @@ config MTD_DEBUG_VERBOSE
> >
> > config MTD_TESTS
> > tristate "MTD tests support"
> > - depends on m
> > + depends on m && EXPERIMENTAL
>
> I am OK with this close, but I am not sure about the EXPERIMENTAL. I
> though this is used for the code which is considered to be "not ready"
> for real use, while the tests work well.

Well, yeah, it is not perfect, but the closest I could come up with
(EXPERT is a lot worse). My reasoning went a bit in the direction of
"you usually need the tests for experimental drivers".

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]