linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Jiandong Zheng <jdzheng@broadcom.com>,
	Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MTD: modify mtd api to return bitflip info on read operations
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:23:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323066236.2316.16.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322943640-11728-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com>

On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 12:20 -0800, Mike Dunn wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch proposes a change to the mtd API for the purpose of returning to
> the caller information on the number of bit errors corrected by the ecc
> facilities of the device during read operations.  The affected functions are
> read() and read_oob().

Mike,

this is quite big patch, and I've realized that it is difficult to
review it because of the size. I know I suggested one big patch, but now
I think we should try to split it, if we can. This way it will also be
easier to pass through dwmw2 because at the end he is the MTD
maintainer.

I can see the following parts in your patch:

1. Mechanical part - no much brains needed, just change prototypes, add
few comments, add NULL arguments everywhere. This is the biggest part. 

2. Implementation part - should be much smaller - implements
max_bitflips support in MTD.

Part 2 is interesting to reveiw, and currently part 1 adds so much noise
that the review becomes difficult. Can you split your patches like that?

I apologize for not suggesting this from the very beginning.

Artem.


P.S. As a side note, I am thinking that with your patch the -EUCLEAN
return code may go away. It has always been a bit ugly interface anyway.
What do you think? My thinking is that we can do this separately later.
But you need to add assertions like:

	WARN_ON(err == -EUCLEAN && max_bitflips == 0);

in interesting places.

It would be easier to do if MTD interface had a single entry point,
though.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-05  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-03 20:20 [PATCH v2] MTD: modify mtd api to return bitflip info on read operations Mike Dunn
2011-12-04  8:43 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-04 13:52   ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 14:43     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-04 14:55       ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05  6:07         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 16:58           ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 17:09             ` Peter Horton
2011-12-05 18:57               ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-06 21:52                 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-12-07  2:16                   ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-07  8:01                     ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-12-07 18:32                       ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-12 12:48                         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-14 20:46                           ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-16 10:09                             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-07  9:42                   ` Peter Horton
2011-12-07 18:33                     ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 14:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05  6:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-12-05 18:13   ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 21:16     ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323066236.2316.16.camel@koala \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dilinger@queued.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
    --cc=jdzheng@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=manuel.lauss@googlemail.com \
    --cc=mcuos.com@gmail.com \
    --cc=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=vimal.newwork@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).