From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RYmIO-0000uf-La for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:18:29 +0000 Received: by laam7 with SMTP id m7so557661laa.36 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:18:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH (mtd-www) 01/13] nand-data: update TC58DVM72A1TG00 BBM info From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Angus CLARK Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:18:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1323173269-19931-1-git-send-email-angus.clark@st.com> References: <1323173269-19931-1-git-send-email-angus.clark@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1323382706.2074.14.camel@koala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 12:07 +0000, Angus CLARK wrote: > Update Toshiba TC58DVM72A1TG00 bad block marker information to "1st page (6th > byte in OOB = non FFh)", as described in datasheet, and confirmed with Toshiba > engineers. > > Signed-off-by: Angus Clark Could you please use --no-chain-reply-to when using git-send-email, or better add this option to you ~/.gitconfig - I think it is generally known that chained replies are PITA to use, especially with long patch series. Thanks!