From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RetAi-0008JK-5a for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:51:48 +0000 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so8621008lah.36 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 10:51:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] introduce wrappers for mtd interfaces From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Mike Dunn Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 20:51:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4EF7383C.6010003@newsguy.com> References: <1324663880-22477-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <4EF7383C.6010003@newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1324839101.2054.2.camel@koala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 06:50 -0800, Mike Dunn wrote: > And a merry Christmas to you too, Artem :) Thanks, merry Christmas. > I guess the plan is to eventually move the wrappers out of the header file and > no longer declare them inline? Those which contain some code - sure.