From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Brad Parker <brad@heeltoe.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ubifs panic with 2.6.39 stable - followup
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:54:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325696066.8917.108.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F043A7C.1060504@heeltoe.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1986 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 06:39 -0500, Brad Parker wrote:
> [sorry for the duplicate post; I tried to post a followup with just
> the url to the pastebin log but for some reason it got stuck
> waiting for the moderator]
>
> Running and older 2.6.31 kernel with UBIFS I see a panic which appears
> to be during recovery of a bad block. The root fs (which is UBIFS)
> won't mount and the kernel panics.
>
> I upgraded the kernel 2.6.39-stable, hoping that would fix the problem,
> as I noticed a lot of recovery fixes had gone in. It still panics;
> it appears the recovery fails.
>
> I rebooted with "ignore_loglevel" and the output is here:
>
> http://pastebin.com/ETJjP4uw
>
> The board is essentially an Olimex SAM9-L9260, with Samsung NAND.
>
> I'm curious if this looks familiar and if it might be fixed post 2.5.39
>
> thanks for any insight.
>
> -brad
>
> UBIFS: recovery needed
> UBI error: ubi_io_read: error -74 (ECC error) while reading 126976 bytes
> from PEB 2970:4096, read 126976 bytes
> UBIFS error (pid 1): ubifs_check_node: bad CRC: calculated 0xf510fb95,
> read 0x4f0a3196
So there is a corrupted inode node, and UBIFS believes it has been
corrupted not because of a power cut. I do not know why it is corrupted,
but if you use MLC then this may be related to the paired pages problem.
Anyway, there is another issue I see from the dump. Even if you somehow
make the node good again, UBIFS will still fail saying something like
"corrupt empty space". Look at line 292 in your pastebin:
ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff ffdfffff ffffffff ffffffff
See that little "d"? It means that the empty space has a bit-flip. The
question is why? Unstable bit I guess? Does your NAND driver / HW
provides ECC protection for empty pages?
Anyway, currently UBIFS cannot handle these situation. Someone needs to
do this - I can assist by reviewing and advising.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-04 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 11:39 ubifs panic with 2.6.39 stable - followup Brad Parker
2012-01-04 16:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-01-04 16:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325696066.8917.108.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=brad@heeltoe.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox