From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246] helo=labridge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1S2onQ-0007lr-G7 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:02:41 +0000 Message-ID: <1330542157.13689.17.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] jffs2: logging message neatening From: Joe Perches To: dedekind1@gmail.com Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:02:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1330517290.3545.107.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <1330517290.3545.107.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 14:08 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 15:56 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > Joe Perches (4): > > jffs2: Convert most D1/D2 macros to jffs2_dbg > > jffs2: Convert printks to pr_ > > jffs2: Use pr_fmt and remove jffs: from formats > > jffs2: Standardize JFFS_ uses > > Thanks for the work, appreciated. But your patch introduces new sparse > and smatch warnings, which did not exist before your patch: Hello Artem. > Successfully built configuration "l2_mxs_defconfig,arm,arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-", results: > > --- before_patching.log > +++ after_patching.log > @@ @@ > +fs/jffs2/file.c:330:2: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [-Wsign-compare] > @@ @@ > -fs/jffs2/read.c:154 jffs2_read_dnode(129) warn: possible memory leak of 'decomprbuf' [smatch] > -fs/jffs2/read.c:154 jffs2_read_dnode(129) warn: possible memory leak of 'readbuf' [smatch] > +fs/jffs2/read.c:154 jffs2_read_dnode(131) warn: possible memory leak of 'decomprbuf' [smatch] > +fs/jffs2/read.c:154 jffs2_read_dnode(131) warn: possible memory leak of 'readbuf' [smatch] > @@ @@ > -fs/jffs2/scan.c:108:54: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Wempty-body] > @@ @@ > +fs/jffs2/super.c:377:1: error: directive in argument list [sparse] > +fs/jffs2/super.c:379:1: error: directive in argument list [sparse] > +fs/jffs2/super.c:380:1: error: directive in argument list [sparse] > +fs/jffs2/super.c:382:1: error: directive in argument list [sparse] I don't see how this is a new error. printk vs pr_info shouldn't change this. maybe it's a smatch issue? > Would you please take a look? Ideally patches should eliminate warnings, > not introduce new ones. I believe this simply exposes a current defect rather than adds "new" ones. It seems the old D1/D2 macros hide them. > Also, your patch does not apply cleanly to my l2-mtd tree - and this is > the tree which is currently used for merging MTD and JFFS2 stuff > upstream, and it is in linux-next as well. Would you send patches > against the l2 tree? This patchset applies cleanly against next-20120229 Where is your git tree? cheers, Joe