From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1S5bOE-0002cy-Fx for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:20:11 +0000 Message-ID: <1331205761.7257.5.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Richard Weinberger Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:22:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4F57CCB9.9090001@linutronix.de> References: <1329250006-22944-1-git-send-email-rw@linutronix.de> <1331136246.32316.39.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4F57CCB9.9090001@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:01 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Please, consider an option of picking a different name. In JFFS2 a > > "similar" thing was called "summaries", and even this is better than > > "checkpoint", I think. > > What about "Erase block indexing"? > Basically a checkpoint is an index... Index is also very loaded word already, and UBIFS has index, would be nice to use a word UBIFS does not use. Thomas's suggestions like fastmap or roadmap/milestone are fine with me. UBIUBI is clever, but probably confusing a bit as well :-) -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy