- * Unquarantined: Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number.
  2012-03-17 18:16 ` [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number Maxim Levitsky
@ 2012-03-20 11:40   ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2012-03-20 11:40   ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2012-05-19 11:28   ` Alex Elsayed
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-03-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Levitsky
  Cc: Alasdair, linux-mtd, John Mesmon, G Kergon,
	LVM general discussion and development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 249 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 20:16 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> major == 0 allocates dynamic major, not major == -1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Pushed to l2-mtd.git, thanks!
-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: ATT00001 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 197 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
[-- Attachment #3: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread 
- * Re: [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number.
  2012-03-17 18:16 ` [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number Maxim Levitsky
  2012-03-20 11:40   ` Unquarantined: Re: [linux-lvm] " Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2012-03-20 11:40   ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2012-05-19 11:28   ` Alex Elsayed
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-03-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Levitsky
  Cc: linux-mtd, John Mesmon, Alasdair G Kergon,
	LVM general discussion and development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 249 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 20:16 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> major == 0 allocates dynamic major, not major == -1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Pushed to l2-mtd.git, thanks!
-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread 
- * Re: [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number.
  2012-03-17 18:16 ` [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number Maxim Levitsky
  2012-03-20 11:40   ` Unquarantined: Re: [linux-lvm] " Artem Bityutskiy
  2012-03-20 11:40   ` Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2012-05-19 11:28   ` Alex Elsayed
  2012-05-19 11:37     ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alex Elsayed @ 2012-05-19 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd; +Cc: linux-lvm
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> major == 0 allocates dynamic major, not major == -1
I would appreciate if this could be submitted for -stable, since the 
negative major number breaks LVM (regardless of whether any such devices are 
present). I found this out the hard way when my system failed to boot. 
-stable note: This is in Linus' tree as 
452380efbd72d8d41f53ea64c8a6ea1fedc4394d
For those who don't know (and potentially as a preface for -stable) the 
reason lies in LVM's filtering; in lib/filter/filter.c, lines 230-233:
        if ((line_maj <= 0) || (line_maj >= NUMBER_OF_MAJORS)) {
            blocksection = (line[i] == 'B') ? 1 : 0;
            continue;
        }
Basically, it scans through /proc/devices until it hits a line starting with 
'B', at which point it starts processing block major numbers and 
whitelisting them to be used as PVs. However, the negative number causes a 
problem because it a.) sorts to the top of the list and b.) short-circuits 
the if(). This causes blocksection to flip back to zero immediately, 
terminating the enumeration of permitted devices before any actually get 
whitelisted. As a result, *all* block devices are ignored, with messages 
such as
Skipping: Unrecognised LVM device type 259
259 being blkext, which LVM explicitly allows.
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH] mtd: sm_ftl: fix typo in major number.
  2012-05-19 11:28   ` Alex Elsayed
@ 2012-05-19 11:37     ` Artem Bityutskiy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-05-19 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Elsayed; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 04:28 -0700, Alex Elsayed wrote:
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> 
> > major == 0 allocates dynamic major, not major == -1
> 
> I would appreciate if this could be submitted for -stable, since the 
> negative major number breaks LVM (regardless of whether any such devices are 
> present). I found this out the hard way when my system failed to boot. 
> 
> -stable note: This is in Linus' tree as 
> 452380efbd72d8d41f53ea64c8a6ea1fedc4394d
It is in Linuses tree already, so I cannot add the "Cc:
stable@kernel.org" tag anymore. You should send a request to Greg and
explain that you want this patch in -stable.
-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread