From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
computersforpeace@gmail.com, boris.brezillon@bootlin.com,
marek.vasut@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ubi: provide a way to skip CRC checks
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2018 21:37:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13338670.5gFP9PctP3@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f9cef553d4f5da3fe2d76113d79ada1f0fe5224.1530169759.git-series.quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2018, 09:40:52 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> Some users of static UBI volumes implement their own integrity check,
> thus making the volume CRC check done at open time useless. For
> instance, this is the case when one use the ubiblock + dm-verity +
> squashfs combination, where dm-verity already checks integrity of the
> block device but this time at the block granularity instead of verifying
> the whole volume.
>
> Skipping this test drastically improves the boot-time.
>
> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-01 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 7:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] ubi: add possibility to skip CRC check for static UBI volumes Quentin Schulz
2018-06-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ubi: provide a way to skip CRC checks Quentin Schulz
2018-07-01 19:37 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2018-07-02 7:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2018-07-02 7:43 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-02 7:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2018-07-02 7:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-02 7:56 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-02 9:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2018-06-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ubi: expose the volume CRC check skip flag Quentin Schulz
2018-07-01 19:35 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-01 20:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-01 20:50 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-02 6:44 ` Quentin Schulz
2018-07-02 6:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-02 6:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-01 20:54 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-01 21:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-01 21:39 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-02 6:46 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13338670.5gFP9PctP3@blindfold \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=quentin.schulz@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).