From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com ([209.85.217.177]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SKOeC-0001kI-BU for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:52 +0000 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so228082lbo.36 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1334731400.12496.7.camel@brekeke> Subject: RE: Query mtd-utils v1.4.9 : flash_erase.c From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:43:20 +0300 In-Reply-To: <071A08F2C6A57E4E94D980ECA553F8745F62AA@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <071A08F2C6A57E4E94D980ECA553F8745E82D5@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> <071A08F2C6A57E4E94D980ECA553F8745EEA99@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> <071A08F2C6A57E4E94D980ECA553F8745F3F98@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> <071A08F2C6A57E4E94D980ECA553F8745F62AA@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , Brian Norris , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Mike Frysinger Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 06:53 +0000, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote: > A general question why these type of patches are not coming in mtd-utils. > Is it because going forward UBIFS is the next file system and nobody wants to focus jffs2. No one would reject good patches which make JFFS2 and related tools work on modern flashes. Feel free to submit. WRT to the links you posted - this was long time ago and I do not remember why they were not merged. But it looks like Stanley wanted to send a new version but never did that. Please, read the discussion here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/30476/focus=31352 BTW, I agree with Mike that -j option is misplaced and it wold be cleaner to create a separate jffs2format tool. Artem.