From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] UBI: UBIVIS (aka checkpointing) support
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:26:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336735603.2625.42.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FACEEA1.9020400@nod.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 12:49 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 11.05.2012 12:46, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 10:33 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> First of all, yes it's fully backward-compatible. It uses two new internal volume IDs
> >> with compat = UBI_COMPAT_DELETE.
> >> Old UBI implementations will delete the checkpoint and continue with scanning...
> >
> > OK. BTW, these patches do not compile when the fastmap is disabled. I
> > hope you'll just kill the ifdefs in the next revision and this problem
> > will go away.
>
> It builds fine here with CONFIG_MTD_UBI_CHECKPOINT=n.
> What error do you get?
If you are going to kill the ifdefs anyway, I won't spend time on this.
I have several defconfigs with different combinations of the UBI
configuration options, probably one of them did not build. Or may be I
made a mistake.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 17:38 [RFC v2] UBI: UBIVIS (aka checkpointing) support Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] UBI: Add checkpoint on-chip layout Richard Weinberger
2012-05-11 11:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-11 12:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-11 12:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-11 17:15 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-11 18:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-11 19:15 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 2/7] [RFC] UBI: Add checkpoint struct to ubi_device Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] UBI: Export next_sqnum() Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] [RFC] UBI: Export compare_lebs() Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] [RFC] UBI: Make wl subsystem checkpoint aware Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] [RFC] UBI: Implement checkpointing support Richard Weinberger
2012-05-09 17:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] [RFC] UBI: wire up checkpointing Richard Weinberger
2012-05-10 4:26 ` [RFC v2] UBI: UBIVIS (aka checkpointing) support Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-10 8:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-11 10:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-11 10:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-11 11:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1336735603.2625.42.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).