From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SSrrd-0003GX-BJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:34:42 +0000 Message-ID: <1336750684.2625.97.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP3: gpmc: add BCH ecc api and modes From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Ivan Djelic Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:38:04 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20120510174527.GA11275@parrot.com> References: <1335442669-13474-1-git-send-email-ivan.djelic@parrot.com> <20120509002927.GF5088@atomide.com> <20120509081047.GC17333@parrot.com> <20120509153141.GI5088@atomide.com> <1336655257.2625.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120510151725.GA11107@parrot.com> <1336665138.2243.1.camel@brekeke> <20120510174527.GA11275@parrot.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zMpYfk1O6GK3+K6hhntK" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Tony Lindgren , "afzal@ti.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-zMpYfk1O6GK3+K6hhntK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 19:45 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > > But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted > > > (in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a consequence, my new patc= h) > > > won't hit 3.5. > > >=20 > > > So, when Afzal's patches are pushed, I'll submit a new, single MTD pa= tch. > >=20 > > But this is not going to happen this merge window as I understood, may > > be not even the next one. We need to make UBIFS happy sooner than that, > > I think. So may be we go forward with your original patch? >=20 > I'm OK with this too, as the patches are ready and tested. > The MTD patch is [2], it depends on [1] which has been pushed, then dropp= ed by Tony. > Do you need me to repost [2] ? >=20 > Tony, sorry to backpedal on this: would you re-push patch [1], if indeed = Afzal's patches > are not going to be merged soon ? In the meantime, I can prepare a patch = on top of Afzal's to > have a smooth transition w.r.t BCH support. What do you think ? OK, since we now have Tony's ack - I have applied both patches to l2-mtd.git. Thanks. I have a question though - will send separately. --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-zMpYfk1O6GK3+K6hhntK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPrTJcAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0aEAQAILr6bS0Wz6ry6+BOiqA+knn GZFTEiJK3CiAFzZ2mBjHbZGEU217qfgBBER7oFciHLW9+urjeF5MuhpCjuxMXbeU 7fkSCwbDAzdKBCf8EDk5hsPUGRpislTHkk0TEVYbAo9JBjpUNGeP5nW99AwUNm6X eu0Crt6EWdRTgmSWX4maHN8wXk0Jw5BCPSR/b15b4N4XyvKMD1Ax2ARPwzz7XNpX Q2zUxDGnXUnarduyeP9Liaeqfrn6sFNYYOLAtPiA3uiM0OTjyXkIn3wT8jQ9s222 m6cVZHNok9ptMDXYEwVCiaNCp/mun/bxB5Bqs7F4Tn7X432esBQEzb+P0yyvdvhE B+FF+cjKZDUo8m40FUvN6C5ESf8xlRN9iXR+GZHDePtjn/ibN7gpt0inAdQSKA0x 0lOF1x8BroJzMlIdUW3eHcIULDgsHsXuB46b3Q9ZzisQ7ZpZlCk2rTqJ/Nc2H8Ku vKPjT5cdRCnlmasY7nfTOhpEY/3R4G1jQd6sQkDBDiSYMFjPb8k6tOdFn32ElME9 eWjKqXk5gkirc/n28qQRILBdiwc3b7jBCwA4NE0dGxvR2TTc2QM/sEwVKLXBmxXN /BdcRGrowRyOlU5KmwNGRbnt8AMeAx02+C0Ol/jB9lpBoi79oaUO3VvNz7aQ3g2d IiGgIOtxUvv+BP5B/Gh/ =5aE+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zMpYfk1O6GK3+K6hhntK--