From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1T3Ao6-0005q7-VK for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:05:07 +0000 Received: by bkcji2 with SMTP id ji2so1991656bkc.36 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1345403092.1930.4.camel@kyv> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: replace MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT with user-space parameter From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Shmulik Ladkani Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:04:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20120819100946.646cbb8a@pixies.home.jungo.com> References: <1341937423-16516-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> <1341937423-16516-5-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> <20120816115713.726da8f2@pixies.home.jungo.com> <20120816134234.32b468f6@pixies.home.jungo.com> <1345124012.3393.239.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120819100946.646cbb8a@pixies.home.jungo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ik5G9eFZxGIKm10HIwG/" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Richard Genoud , David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-ik5G9eFZxGIKm10HIwG/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 10:09 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:33:32 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy = wrote: > > We do not have that big user-base. No one uses 0 in the tree, most use > > the default. I never heard anyone using 0. I did not use it also. I > > think it is OK to have the lower range start from non-zero. But why it > > is 2 and not 1 - I am not sure :-) >=20 > Artem, >=20 > Note that originally range was 0..25 (percentage). >=20 > It was changed to be 2..256 (per 1024) by 07ad322 in linux-ubi. >=20 > Seems arbitrary change. > So if you'd like, we can fix to 1..256 (or 0..256) - as you prefer. Yeah, I wanted to make it 1..256 but forgot, will do now. 0..256 would need some more work to avoid division by 0. --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-ik5G9eFZxGIKm10HIwG/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQMTjUAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0V+sQAI2TWKSc60QnB2+eLnRgCfN5 2WG9EEp5KGF5ytcjKVMH0GK6ceXIE/IYIhANUqm7Fv0itK1iLONpM8fqd49X2uhz ZSX6/QZ6XV4M7CzOnSzGecQb10gNB40XY/1JgkLuU4IzLy+fOh0nT5PFxpYTBUEI 1y6riIyQ4VY8DQ0opwyeifbzsxwdJypJqWioWIiXc6zx0hizTvuxcycmqUeJthxJ jIVQMtJY6nTAfPJd4fpjXJD4mtWopPCuoOmcbNQnrNJfXAz3j22DhTWhiOR5y4DE VASu+1u36OLc6h/q9iHrENJSx5VbOx29uXeJFt82MIqJyTknK5Qoi8H8CzuBNZKp +GY36e7qjKdhTQgVEk5TNUI9qZ6RaQDmlQM39satSmERGvphEN2UrEw4CaSznvRD 0x4I85tlHnToLRaFzUT3HvttvcIG4Q8Dpld/xd+eFVJY0O/1gKkiG/rIoYrS+Av4 C8+5/X9Pq+MoAuJkCSbAmbNWVlJuYhJSnl28ORVUaEhHYP+tk8omypgzicvvswT4 35b16yLJw7GwKdcl/wh3pourchoXYjD2CMVkdn5f5UibAV31+nzoiiqPTAbX+pTZ g5NJTi+uzW2PkefkmHqvFIPJD42Nwn2g+DY+q2XBh8Zj0KQJDOeyWiGjfxR3Sb+6 CB4grFeiOdD+fK2v0v9f =LZHI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ik5G9eFZxGIKm10HIwG/--