From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] ubi: Add ubiblock driver
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:08:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354273697.30168.87.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALF0-+WuaUn5b=2XrzqW7pvM=N1MfQf=sFwLFOrokTkHbOXh3w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1891 bytes --]
Hi, without the reveiw, I can say that overall this sounds good, thanks!
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 19:39 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Also, I've decided to make block devices get automatically created for
> each ubi volume present.
> This has been done to match gluebi behavior of automatically create an
> mtd device
> per ubi volume, and to save us the usertool trouble.
>
> The latter is the most important reason: a new usertool means an added
> complexity
> for the user and yet more crap to maintain.
> I don't know how many ubi volumes a user typically creates, but I
> expect not to be too many.
I think I saw something like 8-10 in some peoples' reports.
> * Read/write support
>
> Yes, this implementation supports read/write access.
> It's expected to work fairly well because the request queue at block elevator
> is suppose to order block transfers to be space-effective.
> In other words, it's expected that reads and writes gets ordered
> to point to the same LEB (see Artem's hint at [1]).
>
> To help this and reduce access to the UBI volume, a 1-LEB size
> write-back cache has been implemented (similar to the one at mtdblock.c).
>
> Every read and every write, goes through this cache and the write is only
> done when a request arrives to read or write to a different LEB or when
> the device is released, when the last file handle is closed.
Sounds good, but you should make sure you flush the cache when the
file-system syncs a file. You can consider this as a disk cache.
File-systems usually sends I/O barriers when the disk cache has to be
flushed. I guess this is what you should also do.
> This cache is 1-LEB bytes, vmalloced at open() and freed at release().
Is it per-block device? Then I am not sure it is a good idea to
automatically create them for every volume...
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-30 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-20 22:39 [RFC/PATCH 0/1] ubi: Add ubiblock driver Ezequiel Garcia
2012-11-21 5:28 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2012-11-21 9:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-21 10:00 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2012-11-21 10:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-24 21:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-11-25 7:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-11-30 11:24 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-12-02 17:39 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-12-03 0:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-03 19:33 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-03 21:03 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-11-30 11:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-11-30 11:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-11-21 10:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-21 10:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-11-30 11:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-11-30 11:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-11-30 20:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354273697.30168.87.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=elezegarcia@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox