From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Lin Wei-B34918 <B34918@freescale.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Subject: Re: question about mtd_torturetest.c
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:58:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359737889.2942.17.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FF9068.1030709@freescale.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 295 bytes --]
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 15:25 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> The mtd_torturetest.c uses the 55/AA patterns to torture the nand block.
> Are the 55/AA patterns more tougher then the random data?
Probably not, please, improve the test.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 8:05 question: Why the nand_wait() wait for 20ms for nand program Huang Shijie
2013-01-18 12:26 ` Matthieu CASTET
2013-01-21 3:34 ` Huang Shijie
2013-01-21 8:57 ` Matthieu CASTET
[not found] ` <50FD0554.8030108@freescale.com>
2013-01-21 9:15 ` Matthieu CASTET
2013-01-21 9:25 ` Huang Shijie
2013-01-21 9:32 ` Matthieu CASTET
2013-01-21 9:35 ` Huang Shijie
[not found] ` <50FF9068.1030709@freescale.com>
2013-02-01 16:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2013-02-04 5:19 ` question about mtd_torturetest.c Gupta, Pekon
2013-02-04 6:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-02-04 7:32 ` Huang Shijie
2013-01-22 2:46 ` question: Why the nand_wait() wait for 20ms for nand program Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359737889.2942.17.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=B34918@freescale.com \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox