From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UCnR1-000796-ON for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:41:20 +0000 Message-ID: <1362472908.2943.30.camel@sauron> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PATCH 02/12] mtd: remove museum NAND ID's support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Alexander Shiyan Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:41:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1362472344.590520456@f357.mail.ru> References: <1362416362.801083474@f211.mail.ru> <1362471499.2943.24.camel@sauron> <1362472344.590520456@f357.mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 12:32 +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 20:59 +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > >From: Artem Bityutskiy > > > > > > > >It is probably OK to remove support for really old NAND chips of 8MiB or > > > >smaller size. We had a separate configuration option for them: > > > >CONFIG_MTD_NAND_MUSEUM_IDS, which we remove along with this patch. > > > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy > > > >--- > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig | 8 -------- > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c | 19 ------------------- > > > > 2 files changed, 27 deletions(-) > > > > > > Hello. > > > This change break systems with these NAND-chips, for example > > > these IDs is used in old DiskOnChip devices. > > > > Do you have one of those and use them with modern kernels ? Which one is > > that? > > Yes. ID used in the MD2800-D08. I specifically included a configuration option > to support this chip ;) Unfortunately, I can not say the exact device ID now because > all of such devices sent in production, and I have no more now. > Of course, these devices are not in production at the moment, but they are still > being sold. OK, probably we can cut on 4MiB boundary then? I mean kill support for 4MiB NANDs and less? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy