From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UDvzX-0008Gh-6N for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:01:43 +0000 Message-ID: <1362744144.21850.196.camel@sauron> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: introduce SST_WRITE flag for SST byte programming From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Krzysztof Mazur Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:02:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1361544666-7148-1-git-send-email-krzysiek@podlesie.net> References: <1361544666-7148-1-git-send-email-krzysiek@podlesie.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 15:51 +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote: > Not all SST devices implement the SST byte programming command. > Some devices (like SST25VF064C) implement only standard m25p80 page > write command. > > Now SPI flash devices that need sst_write() are explicitly marked > with new SST_WRITE flag and the decision to use sst_write() is based > on this flag instead of manufacturer id. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur Pushed both to l2-mtd.git, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy