From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
adrian.hunter@intel.com
Subject: Re: MTD : Kernel oops when remounting ubifs as read/write
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:30:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363257009.11441.97.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51419E3A.8030007@mimc.co.uk>
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 09:54 +0000, Mark Jackson wrote:
> On 14/03/13 09:13, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 11:12 +0000, Mark Jackson wrote:
> >> Sorry ... this just locks up the unit.
> >
> > OK, I've reproduced the issue with 3.9-rc2 in nandsim, see the details
> > below. The patch I proposed did not get the error path correctly, but it
> > does fix the issue.
> >
> > I think what you treat as "lockup" is the fixup process. UBIFS basically
> > reads the entire UBI volume and writes it back. And it uses the atomic
> > change UBI service, which means it also calculates CRC of everything it
> > writes. And this all just takes a lot of time. This has to be done only
> > once on the first mount.
>
> Okay ... I've retried, but how long is "a lot of time" ?
>
> I've waited 15 minutes and still nothing.
>
> And I can see that there's no activity on the NAND chip select !?!
>
> I'll put some debug info into the fixup routines to see if I can trace what's going on.
Just to make sure - try this last patch I sent. I did test it with
nandsim at least, and I am sure it works. I did not test at all the
first one.
And yes, debug messages would be useful, just do not forget to add the
'ignore_loglevel' kernel boot option, otherwise you won't see the
messages on your console, since they are of KERN_DEBUG level.
You may have other issues which cause lockup, e.g., in driver level. It
makes sense to validate your flash with MTD test modules.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 16:42 MTD : Kernel oops when remounting ubifs as read/write Mark Jackson
2013-03-12 11:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-13 11:12 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-13 11:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-13 11:21 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-14 9:13 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-14 9:54 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-14 10:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2013-03-14 11:15 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-14 11:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-14 12:02 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-14 12:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-14 12:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-14 13:40 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-14 13:55 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-15 8:40 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-03-15 8:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363257009.11441.97.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox