From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ubn8n-0006EM-2k for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:25:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1368430080.5360.11.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] ubi: Add ubiblock read-write driver From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:28:00 +0300 In-Reply-To: <201304181630.58886.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1355314912-9321-1-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com> <201304181630.58886.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Ezequiel Garcia , richard.weinberger@gmail.com, Michael Opdenacker , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Tim Bird Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 16:30 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > imo, that support needs to be re-added. it'd be great if we could do > it via > the existing /dev/ubi_ctrl knob, but maybe that'll only work if ubi > +ubiblock > are built into the kernel, or if ubiblock is merged with ubi ? Yeah, re-using the ubi_ctl device makes sense. And UBI can probably invoke 'request_module()' if needed, so that we avoid any of "work only if both built-in" conditions. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy