From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ucrvq-0000ax-7s for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:44:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1368686834.15764.167.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: optimize vid-header IO read checks From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "Gupta, Pekon" Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:47:14 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73E9C4E67@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> References: <1367157069-18994-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73E9C4E67@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 06:38 +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > Hi, > > Requesting feedbacks/comments on this one too ? > This should be independent of previous one.. How did you test this change? Did you test that we do not die in scanning in case of bit-flips? How about ECC errors? Do we scrub eraseblocks then? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy