From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VAKGs-0002Rr-Rr for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:40:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1376660759.2089.358.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] mtd: update the ABI document about the ecc step size From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Huang Shijie Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:45:59 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1376619009-8622-7-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> References: <1376619009-8622-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1376619009-8622-7-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, pekon@ti.com Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 10:10 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > + > +What: /sys/class/mtd/mtdX/ecc_step_size > +Date: May 2013 > +KernelVersion: 3.10 > +Contact: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > +Description: > + The size of each ECC step which is used for ECC. > + Note that some devices will have multiple ecc steps within each > + writesize region. Actually this phrase is a bit confusing because it may be interpreted as that one write-size may have ECC steps of multiple sizes. Would you re-phrase, may be? Otherwise the patch-set looks good, thanks, but I am not merging the patches to let Brian review. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy