[PATCH 02/12] mtd: nand: lpc32xx_slc: don't call nand_default_bbt directly

[Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>]

This driver is doing some strange logic here. If it doesn't have
flash-based BBT enabled, it allows nand_scan_tail() to scan the BBT. But
if it is using flash-based BBT, it tells nand_scan_tail() to skip
scanning, then it immediately calls the default BBT scanning function
itself.

As I read it, this logic is equivalent to the default nand_scan_tail()
behavior without interfering with NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN or calling
nand_default_bbt() directly at all.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c
index add7570..6d5f8c5 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c
@@ -893,7 +893,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* Avoid extra scan if using BBT, setup BBT support */
 	if (host->ncfg->use_bbt) {
-		chip->options |= NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN;
 		chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
 
 		/*
@@ -915,13 +914,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_exit3;
 	}
 
-	/* Standard layout in FLASH for bad block tables */
-	if (host->ncfg->use_bbt) {
-		if (nand_default_bbt(mtd) < 0)
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-			       "Error initializing default bad block tables\n");
-	}
-
 	mtd->name = "nxp_lpc3220_slc";
 	ppdata.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	res = mtd_device_parse_register(mtd, NULL, &ppdata, host->ncfg->parts,
-- 
1.8.4