From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VJtWy-00053p-GB for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:09:05 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id i7so10082166oag.36 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:08:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Norris To: Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: cleanup ONFI printed errors, warnings Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:08:14 -0700 Message-Id: <1378940894-27598-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Huang Shijie , Brian Norris , Ezequiel Garcia List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , The ONFI detection routine is too verbose in some cases and not verbose enough in others. This patch refactors it to print only when there are significant warnings/errors. Probing in 16-bit mode: It is unnecessary to print until after the READID (address 20h) command. READID *has* to work properly in whatever bus width configuration we are in, or else no identification mode works. So we can silence some useless warnings on systems which come up in 16-bit mode and do not even respond with an O-N-F-I string. Valid parameter page: Nobody needs to see this. Do we inform the user every time other hardware responds properly? Instead, add an error message if *no* uncorrupted parameter pages are found. ONFI ECC: Most drivers don't yet use the reported minimum ECC values, so it shouldn't yet be a fatal condition if the extended parameter page is incorrect. But we should at least give a warning for the corner cases that we don't expect. ONFI flash detected: Nobody needs to see this. This is the expected case, that we detect ONFI properly, or else it wasn't ONFI-compliant and is detected by some other routine. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris Cc: Huang Shijie Cc: Ezequiel Garcia --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 7ed4841..d4578a1 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -2937,29 +2937,34 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, int i; int val; - /* ONFI need to be probed in 8 bits mode, and 16 bits should be selected with NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO */ - if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) { - pr_err("Trying ONFI probe in 16 bits mode, aborting !\n"); - return 0; - } /* Try ONFI for unknown chip or LP */ chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READID, 0x20, -1); if (chip->read_byte(mtd) != 'O' || chip->read_byte(mtd) != 'N' || chip->read_byte(mtd) != 'F' || chip->read_byte(mtd) != 'I') return 0; + /* + * ONFI must be probed in 8-bit mode or with NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO, not + * with NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 + */ + if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) { + pr_err("ONFI cannot be probed in 16-bit mode; aborting\n"); + return 0; + } + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_PARAM, 0, -1); for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { chip->read_buf(mtd, (uint8_t *)p, sizeof(*p)); if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (uint8_t *)p, 254) == le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) { - pr_info("ONFI param page %d valid\n", i); break; } } - if (i == 3) + if (i == 3) { + pr_err("Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting\n"); return 0; + } /* Check version */ val = le16_to_cpu(p->revision); @@ -3011,10 +3016,11 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, /* The Extended Parameter Page is supported since ONFI 2.1. */ if (nand_flash_detect_ext_param_page(mtd, chip, p)) - pr_info("Failed to detect the extended param page.\n"); + pr_warn("Failed to detect ONFI extended param page\n"); + } else { + pr_warn("Could not retrieve ONFI ECC requirements\n"); } - pr_info("ONFI flash detected\n"); return 1; } -- 1.8.4