From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Va0wj-0006D4-0y for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:18:17 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so4841956wgh.10 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1382782672.5901.25.camel@karhu.quadriga.com> Subject: Re: Patching mkfs.ubifs.c for running under Windows ? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: gutemine Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:17:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7c74c0d714e8e87daebbfd0163642d71@localhost> References: <7c74c0d714e8e87daebbfd0163642d71@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 12:58 +0200, gutemine wrote: > As users of ubidump under Windows now asked me for getting also the > possibility to re-pack their extracted ubifs images, I'm considering to > patch mkfs.ubifs.c, so that it handles also the Windows hard and softlinks > and my dummy device files correctly. Generally, I am OK with making the code support windows, why not? But this should be done very nicely and should not be intrusive. I guess you should send patches and then we'll see. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy