From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WKov5-0003RV-Ca for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:58:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1393937858.6302.1.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: block: do not use term "attach" From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Ezequiel Garcia Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:57:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1393927373-1472-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> References: <1393927373-1472-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: MTD Maling List Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:02 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > + * This feature is compiled in the UBI core, and adds a 'block' parameter > + * to allow early creation of block devices on top of UBI volumes. Runtime > + * block creation/removal for UBI volumes is provided through two UBI ioctls: > + * UBI_IOCVOLATTBLK and UBI_IOCVOLDETBLK. > */ I think the ioctl names should also be consistent. s/AT/CR/, s/DET/RM/, may be? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy