From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WNMPk-0005nH-Fx for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:08:13 +0000 Message-ID: <1394543187.2399.11.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS: remove check for all(0xff) for empty pages From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Matthieu CASTET Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:06:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140311132109.4201b0dd@parrot.com> References: <1394518992-26969-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <1394523766.6302.216.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20140311132109.4201b0dd@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kent Li , Stefan Roese , HOUR Frderic , linux-mtd , Pekon Gupta , Ezequiel Garcia , Brian Norris Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 13:21 +0100, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > I think this is not true with MLC flash that Pekon want to handle. Correct. But this is a different issue. Let's not confuse ourselves and not mix them. Right now we are discussing bit-flips in the empty space. We are not discussing MLC issues. > There is the paired page problem [1] and the power cut corruption can > happen in more than one page. That's right. But this is another issue: UBIFS was not designed for MLC. This can also be fixed, but this is a completely separate activity. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy