From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1395317630.7776.29.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Remove useless consts from function arguments From: Joe Perches To: Lee Jones Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:13:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140320120307.GA9240@lee--X1> References: <1395313907-25318-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1395313907-25318-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1395314713.7776.17.camel@joe-AO722> <20140320114123.GE21349@lee--X1> <1395316090.7776.24.camel@joe-AO722> <20140320115412.GU31517@norris-Latitude-E6410> <20140320120307.GA9240@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: angus.clark@st.com, kernel@stlinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Brian Norris , dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:03 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > Good catch. That wasn't my intention. > > > Why? > An oversight. That's still not an explanation. Why, unless cast away by the code itself, is const removal a good thing? It does serve as an indication to a reader what the code does with the argument. About the only reason I can think of arguing in favor of removal is inconsistent application of const within the module.