From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1WzJMq-0004Et-P0
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:34:05 +0000
Message-ID: <1403587860.7903.82.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Subject: Re: UBI: fix rb_tree node comparison in add_map commit buggy?
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com
To: hs@denx.de
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:31:00 +0300
In-Reply-To: <53A90BEE.5020209@denx.de>
References: <53A7EF04.7040805@denx.de> <53A809A3.30703@denx.de>
 <53A82077.6090109@nod.at> <53A82609.9090408@denx.de>
 <53A87AD5.8050305@nod.at> <1403585976.7903.70.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
 <53A90BEE.5020209@denx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 07:26 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Artem,
> 
> Am 24.06.2014 06:59, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 21:07 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> I think it would be better to "fix" the whole logic such that low volume ids go into
> >> the left rb node instead of the right.
> >> Just to avoid further confusion.
> >> Artem, do you know why UBI does it the other way around for volume ids?
> >
> > I do not remember. Probably no particular reason.
> >
> > I'd suggest to do a quick fix first and submit to Linus for 3.16, and
> > then people can do whatever logic streamlining for 3.17, makes sense?
> 
> I posted such a patch, but for some reason, I could not find it in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-June/date.html
> 
> Here an extract from the header I got, as I was on Cc ...
> 
> From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>,
> 	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
> 	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
> 	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
> 	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
> 	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
> 	Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>,
> 	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] ubi: fix correct rb_tree node comparison in add_vol
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:27:09 +0200
> Message-Id: <1403530029-12151-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1

I do not see it in my @linux.intel.com mailbox either, probably
something went wrong on your side?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy