From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 157G6f-0004fm-00 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 13:38:45 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <15132.41562.879696.484467@pizda.ninka.net> References: <15132.41562.879696.484467@pizda.ninka.net> <15132.40298.80954.434805@pizda.ninka.net> <15132.22933.859130.119059@pizda.ninka.net> <13942.991696607@redhat.com> <3B1C1872.8D8F1529@mandrakesoft.com> <15132.15829.322534.88410@pizda.ninka.net> <20010605155550.C22741@metastasis.f00f.org> <25587.991730769@redhat.com> <25831.991731935@redhat.com> To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Chris Wedgwood , Jeff Garzik , bjornw@axis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Missing cache flush. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 13:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: <14071.991744970@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: davem@redhat.com said: > David Woodhouse writes: > > What shall we call this function? The intuitive "flush_dcache_range" > > appears to have already been taken. > Call it flush_ecache_full() or something. Strange name. Why? How about __flush_cache_range()? -- dwmw2