From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XQvXp-0004eW-PA for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:47:34 +0000 Message-ID: <1410169630.10764.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: Ubi patch proposition for 3.10.y From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:47:10 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5407914B.302@nod.at> References: <5404EA4F.1040508@nod.at> <20140901220258.GA28791@kroah.com> <5407914B.302@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Greg KH , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , jean-philippe francois , stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 00:08 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > e8c235b UBI: init_volumes: Ignore volumes with no LEBs > 44305eb UBI: fastmap: do not miss bit-flips > 604b592 UBI: fix rb_tree node comparison in add_map > 5547fec UBI: fix some use after free bugs > fe24c6e UBI: Fix memory leak in ubi_attach_fastmap() error path > c22301a UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq > 4b3e0a2 UBI: Call scan_all() with correct offset in error case > f240dca UBI: Fix error path in scan_pool() > fb10e4d UBI: fix refill_wl_user_pool() > 8930fa5 UBI: Fix invalidate_fastmap() The entire "fastmap" feature is classified as "experimental", why would we need to be submit these to stable? I mean, we do not treat the feature as bullet proof anyway yet. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy