Re: [PATCH 2/3] UBI: block: Add support for the UBI_VOLUME_UPDATED notification

Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-16T15:35:29Z

On 16 September 2014 16:32, Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
> On 16 September 2014 16:15, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 15:27 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> On 08 Sep 03:47 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 08:18 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> > > Regarding -stable, I think it's worth to pull the whole series.
>>> >
>>> > I've checked and the patches do not apply to 3.16 with many conflicts.
>>> > Are you enthusiastic enough to try this and fined out the missing
>>> > dependencies?
>>> >
>>> > The we could add the "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+" tags, and
>>> > also mentioned the commits we depend on in the commit messages.
>>> >
>>> > At this point I pushed your patches to the master branch. If you are
>>> > going to check the stable story, please, use this branch.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Sure, I'll prepare the list of commits and let you know.
>>
>> Should I wait some more or assume we won't add the stable tags and add
>> these patches to the 'next' branch? It is about time, I guess.
>>
>
> Yeah, I have the list of commits ready a couple weeks ago:
>
> 4fda380 UBI: Dispatch update notification if the volume is updated
> 46a5b80 UBI: block: Add support for the UBI_VOLUME_UPDATED notification
> db95429 UBI: block: Fix block device size setting
> 3170403 UBI: block: Avoid disk size integer overflow
> b6c7b28 UBI: block: Set disk_capacity out of the mutex
> 1860e37 Linux 3.15
>
> I just got delayed thinking if it was OK to pick so many commits into
> stable. As an alternative,
> we can mark only the ones on this patchset, namely:
>
> 4fda380 UBI: Dispatch update notification if the volume is updated
> 46a5b80 UBI: block: Add support for the UBI_VOLUME_UPDATED notification
> db95429 UBI: block: Fix block device size setting
>

Of course, the commit hashes above are all wrong.
--
Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur