From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XgDNR-0002gn-NJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:52:02 +0000 Message-ID: <1413813074.7906.294.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Joe Perches Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:51:14 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1413302724.3269.18.camel@joe-AO725> References: <1413296037-22346-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <543D304C.5000607@codeaurora.org> <1413297205.3269.11.camel@joe-AO725> <1413299231.7906.101.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <1413302724.3269.18.camel@joe-AO725> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tanya Brokhman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, open list , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com, Richard Weinberger , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 09:05 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > It's pretty trivial when all the lines are already > being touched. OK, but then the same change should done in UBIFS, because it's ubifs_msg() and so on macros are consistent with UBI macros. So I think if this is done, then it is done separately for both UBI and UBIFS. Artem.