From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay0230.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.230] helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Xj94A-00087q-CH for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:52:15 +0000 Message-ID: <1414511499.6643.11.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] seq_printf cleanups From: Joe Perches To: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:51:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20141028113240.74dbe5c5@gandalf.local.home> References: <20140929124246.3e39dac8@gandalf.local.home> <20141028113240.74dbe5c5@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek , cluster-devel@redhat.com, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 11:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > If you haven't already done so, can you update checkpatch.pl to > complain if someone checks the return value of seq_printf(), > seq_puts(), or seq_putc(). I'm not sure that matters much as a rule because I hope soon the compiler will bleat when that happens. There are several more too: seq_vprintf seq_escape seq_write seq_bitmap seq_cpumask/seq_nodemask (and _list variants), seq_put_decimal_xxx