From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtprelay0032.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.32]
 helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com)
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1XjAj0-0006AI-54
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:38:30 +0000
Message-ID: <1414517881.10912.2.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] docg3: Fix miuse of seq_printf return value
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:38:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20141028133253.223e47f7@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20140929124246.3e39dac8@gandalf.local.home>
 <cover.1412031505.git.joe@perches.com>
 <c1a1138f1b05e87a3fbd8737af2f2c0be6e2724b.1412031505.git.joe@perches.com>
 <20141022082916.GD16128@brian-ubuntu>
 <20141028111301.22481f2a@gandalf.local.home>
 <1414511877.6643.12.camel@perches.com>
 <20141028120552.63c2324c@gandalf.local.home>
 <1414517260.6643.21.camel@perches.com>
 <20141028133253.223e47f7@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
 linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:27:40 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 12:05 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I would like to get this done before I do my merge of trace_seq and
> > > seq_file, but I'm thinking I may have to do that in parallel.
> > 
> > I think the most important thing is to get the
> > seq_is_overflown (or seq_has_overflowed or whatever
> > other name is chosen) function added then the rest
> > of the patches can be applied whenever maintainers
> > (or Andrew or trivial or ...) pick them up.
> 
> I can get that in without much of an issue. But the merge of trace_seq
> and seq_file would be easier if I didn't have to worry about return
> values. Which is why I want to get this in quickly.

What is the issue there?