From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16qUFW-0002mx-00 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:23:06 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020328054604.BFC5D2755@sitemail.everyone.net> References: <20020328054604.BFC5D2755@sitemail.everyone.net> To: zeusj@firstlinux.net Cc: all in MTD mailinglist Subject: Re: Whats wrong with my jffs2? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:23:04 +0000 Message-ID: <14146.1017300184@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: zeusj@firstlinux.net said: > Thanks, I have checked the devices.txt, so I got why the odd mtd > "permission denied". But if the device nodes with major 31 ,mi 0-7 are > ROM card (as the device.txt said),why my flash can works without > nothing wrong? I think the minor number should be 8-15 , isnt it? Hmmm. That's out of date - I reused the major number. I thought the change had propagated to devices.txt by now. We don't actually distinguish between flash and ROM 'cards'. > jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x000e0014: 0x552f instead Did you erase the flash completely before putting the JFFS2 image on there? > VFS: Mounted root (jffs2 filesystem) readonly. Add 'rw' to the kernel command line (and/or remove 'ro') ? -- dwmw2