From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: axboe@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:56:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415354191.958.307.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545C96A1.40304@nod.at>
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 10:53 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 07.11.2014 um 10:46 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 09:23 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 03.11.2014 um 09:18 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> >>> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>>> +#define UBIBLOCK_SG_COUNT 64
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can you document why you choose this number? The default nr_request
> >>> for the old code would be 128.
> >>
> >> Is 64 a problem? Beside of the fact that I forgot to set blk_queue_max_segments().
> >> I used this number because 128 seemed a bit high and my goal was to
> >> keep the memory footprint small.
> >> This is also why I've set tag_set.queue_depth to 64.
> >
> > The request was to document, so lets' document the choice.
>
> Of course I'll document it. But so far I had no time to do a
> v2 of this patch.
Your reply just sounded like you are complaining to the request (starts
with "is this a problem?"). And it looked like you try to defend the 64
choice, while no one challenged it.
So my e-mail is to just kindly help you by pointing that the request was
to only add a piece of doc so far, in case you misinterpreted it.
Artem.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-07 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-02 13:00 [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support Richard Weinberger
2014-11-02 21:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-02 22:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-02 22:27 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-02 22:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-03 1:20 ` Jens Axboe
2014-11-03 1:18 ` Jens Axboe
2014-11-03 5:03 ` Ming Lei
2014-11-03 13:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-03 18:22 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-03 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-03 8:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-07 9:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-11-07 9:53 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-07 9:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415354191.958.307.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox