From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XoX6W-0007qD-Iy for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:32:57 +0000 Message-ID: <1415795552.22887.247.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:32:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <54626835.40503@nod.at> References: <1415023112-21704-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <5460F7D8.2030100@nod.at> <5461C5AD.5040705@nod.at> <1415707434.22887.158.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <5462003C.9090509@nod.at> <1415712477.22887.172.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <54626835.40503@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tanya Brokhman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, open list , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Brian Norris , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 20:49 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > I am OK with removing function names from warnings and errors, though. > > But they were there since the very beginning, and changing this is a > > separate subject, so I'd prefer someone else to submit a corresponding > > patch. > > If we keep the function names away from ubi_msg() I'm perfectly fine. :-) OK, I'm pushing the patch I sent.