From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bl2on0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.135] helo=na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Y13Ue-0006ww-VP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:33:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1418779984.5581.109.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][v4] IFC: Change IO accessor based on endianness From: Scott Wood To: Brian Norris Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:33:04 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20141217012610.GP9759@ld-irv-0074> References: <1418017580-2749-1-git-send-email-b44839@freescale.com> <1418079383.5581.14.camel@freescale.com> <20141217012610.GP9759@ld-irv-0074> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: B07421@freescale.com, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, B32579@freescale.com, Jaiprakash Singh List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 17:26 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:56:23PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 11:16 +0530, Jaiprakash Singh wrote: > > > From: Jaiprakash Singh > > > > > > IFC IO accressor are set at run time based > > > on IFC IP registers endianness.IFC node in > > > DTS file contains information about > > > endianness. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaiprakash Singh > > > --- > > > Changes for v4 > > > - Review rework as per Scott's comments > > > - Tested on B4860QDS board > > > --- > > > .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl/ifc.txt | 3 + > > > drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c | 34 ++- > > > drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 260 ++++++++++---------- > > > include/linux/fsl_ifc.h | 50 ++++ > > > 4 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Scott Wood > > I can't locate a patch for this. Did linux-mtd get CC'd? (Or, did any > mailing list get CC'd? I don't see it on any search engines.) linux-mtd was CCed, but I don't see this or v3 or anything else from Jaiprakash in the archives. -Scott