From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YKj8r-0000Un-NP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 07:52:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1423468308.2573.4.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] UBIFS recovery From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: hujianyang Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:51:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <54D81C9B.8070500@huawei.com> References: <54D33C36.9060805@huawei.com> <1423242166.8637.566.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <54D81C9B.8070500@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd , Sheng Yong List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 10:34 +0800, hujianyang wrote: > Good suggestions. I will try to realize periodically commit first. But I > don't know if this feature is really needed. Switch to R/O and revert to > last comitted state? But we just consider about log before, never think > about index. I think the right way to approach this problem is to come up with a high level summary of the problems we are trying to solve, and the solutions, along with some analysis of the solutions. This does not have to be very detailed, but it should put everyone involved into the same page. Artem.